Alabama Supreme Court Causes Marriage License Confusion

 ========= Old Image Removed =========Array
(
    [_wp_attached_file] => Array
        (
            [0] => 2010/05/alabama-courthouse.jpg
        )

    [_wp_attachment_metadata] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:5:{s:5:"width";i:640;s:6:"height";i:360;s:4:"file";s:30:"2010/05/alabama-courthouse.jpg";s:5:"sizes";a:9:{s:6:"medium";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-336x189.jpg";s:5:"width";i:336;s:6:"height";i:189;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:9:"thumbnail";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-140x140.jpg";s:5:"width";i:140;s:6:"height";i:140;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:9:"wbhm-icon";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:28:"alabama-courthouse-80x80.jpg";s:5:"width";i:80;s:6:"height";i:80;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:20:"wbhm-featured-square";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-600x360.jpg";s:5:"width";i:600;s:6:"height";i:360;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:18:"wbhm-featured-home";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-553x311.jpg";s:5:"width";i:553;s:6:"height";i:311;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:22:"wbhm-featured-carousel";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-470x265.jpg";s:5:"width";i:470;s:6:"height";i:265;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:28:"ab-block-post-grid-landscape";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-600x360.jpg";s:5:"width";i:600;s:6:"height";i:360;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:25:"ab-block-post-grid-square";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-600x360.jpg";s:5:"width";i:600;s:6:"height";i:360;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:14:"post-thumbnail";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-125x125.jpg";s:5:"width";i:125;s:6:"height";i:125;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}}s:10:"image_meta";a:12:{s:8:"aperture";s:1:"0";s:6:"credit";s:0:"";s:6:"camera";s:0:"";s:7:"caption";s:0:"";s:17:"created_timestamp";s:1:"0";s:9:"copyright";s:0:"";s:12:"focal_length";s:1:"0";s:3:"iso";s:1:"0";s:13:"shutter_speed";s:1:"0";s:5:"title";s:0:"";s:11:"orientation";s:1:"0";s:8:"keywords";a:0:{}}}
        )

    [_imagify_data] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:2:{s:5:"stats";a:3:{s:13:"original_size";i:0;s:14:"optimized_size";i:0;s:7:"percent";i:0;}s:5:"sizes";a:1:{s:4:"full";a:2:{s:7:"success";b:0;s:5:"error";s:77:"WELL DONE. This image is already compressed, no further compression required.";}}}
        )

    [_imagify_status] => Array
        (
            [0] => already_optimized
        )

    [_imagify_optimization_level] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

)
1619475472 
1435600561

In an order released Monday, the Alabama Supreme Court is inviting parties to submit briefs “addressing the effects of the Supreme Court’s decision” in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Many lawyers and other experts first interpreted the order as a 25-day buffer period before Alabama probate judges would have to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. However, further analysis concluded that the order does not include any directions for probate judges.

John Carroll, former U.S. Magistrate Judge and Samford law professor, says the order gives probate judges some temporary power.

“It meant that the probate judges don’t have to issue the licenses [to same-sex couples],” he says, “but they can if they want to.”

Carroll says it’s unclear whether the 25-day buffer period still stands, and the Alabama Supreme Court will have to give further direction before anything will change.

“I think the court’s going to have to issue another order,” he says, “or I think probate judges will continue doing what’s going on now– which is some are issuing licenses and some aren’t.”

An Associated Press telephone survey of counties on Monday found that nearly half of Alabama’s counties (at least 32 of the state’s 67 counties) were issuing the licenses to gay couples.

Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore agreed with Carroll’s assessment. “What the order means is that within that 25-day period no [probate judge] has to issue a marriage license to a same sex couple,” Moore told al.com.

Why 25 days?

“Every appellate court, including the U.S. Supreme Court, has a period of time after they rule for the parties to seek rehearing,” says Carroll.

According to U.S. Supreme Court Rule 44 , “Any petition for the rehearing of any judgment or decision of the Court on the merits shall be filed within 25 days after entry of the judgment or decision.”

“If the court doesn’t grant rehearing in 25 days, then the order is in deed final,” says Carroll. “No one, quite frankly, expects the ruling of the Supreme Court to be altered in any shape or form.”

No More Licenses

Several Alabama counties, like Pike County, have shut down marriage license operations altogether.

Reporting for NPR, Troy Public Radio’s Kyle Gassiott says “marriage licenses haven’t been issued (in Pike County) to gay or straight couples since February, in protest of an earlier court decision that briefly legalized gay marriage in the state.” On Friday, Pike County Probate Judge Wes Allen released a statement saying he believes the U.S. Supreme Court overstepped its authority and that Pike County would no long issue marriage licenses to anyone.

Additional reporting provided by the Associated Press. Updated Tuesday, June 30 with additional information on U.S. Supreme Court rehearing rules. 

 

Florida’s 6-week abortion ban will have a ‘snowball effect’ on residents across the South

Abortion rights advocates say the ban will likely force many to travel farther for abortion care and endure pregnancy and childbirth against their will.

Attitudes among Alabama lawmakers softening on Medicaid expansion

Alabama is one of ten states which has not expanded Medicaid. Republican leaders have pushed back against the idea for years.

Birmingham is 3rd worst in the Southeast for ozone pollution, new report says

The American Lung Association's "State of the Air" report shows some metro areas in the Gulf States continue to have poor air quality.

Why haven’t Kansas and Alabama — among other holdouts — expanded access to Medicaid?

Only 10 states have not joined the federal program that expands Medicaid to people who are still in the "coverage gap" for health care

Once praised, settlement to help sickened BP oil spill workers leaves most with nearly nothing

Thousands of ordinary people who helped clean up after the 2010 BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico say they got sick. A court settlement was supposed to help compensate them, but it hasn’t turned out as expected.

Q&A: How harm reduction can help mitigate the opioid crisis

Maia Szalavitz discusses harm reduction's effectiveness against drug addiction, how punitive policies can hurt people who need pain medication and more.

More Front Page Coverage